{"id":113745,"date":"2026-04-04T02:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-04T00:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/?p=113745"},"modified":"2026-04-04T11:16:26","modified_gmt":"2026-04-04T09:16:26","slug":"how-europe-can-use-emissions-trading-to-also-manage-carbon-removals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/en\/politics\/how-europe-can-use-emissions-trading-to-also-manage-carbon-removals\/","title":{"rendered":"How Europe can use emissions trading to also manage carbon removals"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The emissions trading system launched by the European Union in 2005 could one day also be used to capture CO\u2082 on a large scale. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
A new model study quantifies the potential, and outlines that phased integration of removals into the trading system can avoid misguided incentives, while providing industry with planning security for residual emissions that are hard-to-abate. The study, led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in Joule, ties in with current discussions in Brussels on future regulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to the study, the existing EU emissions trading system for the energy sector and energy-intensive industries alone could provide incentives for companies to remove between 68 and 86 million tonnes of CO\u2082 from the atmosphere annually by 2050, depending on cost developments. The research team uses the LIMES-EU calculation model developed at PIK, which optimises investment decisions. The analysis is based on the EU, as well as the United Kingdom and Norway. And it focuses on two novel, promising removal methods: using air filter systems (\u201cdirect air capture\u201d) and burning biomass with CO\u2082 sequestration (\u201cbioenergy with carbon capture\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Supports acceptance of climate policy<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe removal potential we have calculated would make a significant contribution to the implementation of the EU climate targets,\u201d says Darius Sultani, PIK researcher and lead author of the study. \u201cOf course, dedicated support programmes for removals are also needed to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, and net carbon removals thereafter. But fiscal space is limited, and it makes sense to make good use of the market-based instrument of emissions trading. We show how this could work \u2013 and that it even strengthens the acceptance of climate policy.\u201d
At present, firms are looking ahead to 2039 with concern: the annual reduction in emission allowances for the energy sector and energy-intensive industries will then reach zero, and CO\u2082 emissions will in principle be taboo. There are considerations to soften the timeline, but a more elegant solution emerges if removal companies are added to the system. These would be rewarded for their \u201cnegative emissions\u201d with certificates from the trading system, which they would then be able to resell to companies that have not (yet) completely eliminated their CO\u2082 emissions.
The study calculates what the market equilibrium would be in such an environment, and finds that investments in the two new removal technologies will become more attractive \u2013 although the technology mix will heavily depend on the extent to which costs can be reduced through technical advances in air filtration. It also shows that the carbon price formed in emissions trading will rise steadily to a good 400 euros per tonne by 2050, but will then stabilise at a slightly lower level in the second half of the century due to the inclusion of removals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A step-by-step model for implementation<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Based on the model analysis, the research team then delivers a concept for integrating carbon removals into emissions trading. It recommends a step-by-step approach to ensure that rapid emission reductions towards zero remain the priority, and that carbon removal via bioenergy does not jeopardise biodiversity or the water cycle. First, precise standards for monitoring, reporting and verification should be established. Subsequently, removal projects would be gradually transferred to the trading system, in increasing quantities and in a manner that avoids misguided incentives for investors. Only in the third step, around 2040, would all removals and residual emissions be controlled via a uniform carbon price.
\u201cWith this scientifically sound proposal, we are targeting the current political discussion in Brussels on the future regulation of carbon removals,\u201d explains Michael Pahle, PIK researcher and a co-author of the study. \u201cThe decision on whether to transfer removals to EU emissions trading is now pending, and the European Commission must submit a proposal on this by 2026. Our study shows that the objections to this can be refuted.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n