{"id":75461,"date":"2021-10-03T09:40:00","date_gmt":"2021-10-03T07:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/?p=75461"},"modified":"2021-10-03T09:40:01","modified_gmt":"2021-10-03T07:40:01","slug":"eu-not-doing-enough-to-stimulate-sustainable-investments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/en\/economy\/eu-not-doing-enough-to-stimulate-sustainable-investments\/","title":{"rendered":"EU not doing enough to stimulate sustainable investments"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The transition to a net-zero emission economy will require significant private and public
investment, but the EU is not doing enough to channel money into sustainable activities. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the conclusion of a special report by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) that calls for more consistent EU action. The European Commission has rightly focused on increasing transparency in the market, but the auditors criticise the lack of accompanying measures to address the environmental and social cost of unsustainable economic activities. According to the report, the Commission needs to apply consistent criteria to determine the sustainability of EU budget investments and better target efforts to generate sustainable investment opportunities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe EU\u2019s actions on sustainable finance will not be fully effective unless additional measures are taken to price in the environmental and social costs of unsustainable activities,\u201d said Eva Lindstr\u00f6m, the Member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report. \u201cUnsustainable business is still too profitable. The Commission has done a lot to make this unsustainability transparent, but this underlying problem still needs to be addressed\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main issues are that the market fails to price in the negative environmental and social effects of unsustainable activities, and that there is a general lack of transparency on what is sustainable. The Commission\u2019s 2018 Sustainable Finance Action Plan addressed these issues only partially, the auditors say; many measures suffered delays and require further steps to become operational. The auditors highlight the need to fully implement the action plan and underline the importance of completing the common classification system for sustainable activities (the EU Taxonomy) based on scientific criteria. They recommend additional measures to ensure that the pricing of greenhouse gas emissions better reflects their environmental cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report also highlights the important role the European Investment Bank (EIB) plays in
sustainable finance. As regards EU financial support managed by the EIB, the auditors found that support provided by the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) did not focus on where sustainable investment is most needed, in particular in central and eastern Europe. In addition, only a very small part was spent on adaptation to climate change. To change this, they recommend that the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, should develop a sustainable project pipeline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n