{"id":86422,"date":"2022-10-31T09:01:02","date_gmt":"2022-10-31T08:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/?p=86422"},"modified":"2022-10-31T09:01:03","modified_gmt":"2022-10-31T08:01:03","slug":"more-methane-from-siberia-in-summer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sonnenseite.com\/en\/science\/more-methane-from-siberia-in-summer\/","title":{"rendered":"More methane from Siberia in summer"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

What happens in the vast permafrost regions of the Arctic when the atmosphere heats up more and more? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question still drives climate researchers because the frozen ground contains large amounts of carbon, which can be converted by microbes into the greenhouse gases methane and CO2<\/sub>. If the gases are released, this could accelerate global warming even more. Now, GFZ researchers Torsten Sachs and Norman R\u00f6\u00dfger, together with colleagues from the University of Hamburg and the Alfred Wegener Institute in Potsdam, have published results from an almost twenty-year series of observations in Siberia that actually show that the summertime release of methane has increased by almost two percent per year since 2004. The cause, however, is not a more massive thawing of permafrost, the researchers say, but earlier onset and increased plant growth due to increased air temperature. The study appeared on October 27 in the journal Nature Climate Change<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data collection in the Siberian Lena Delta<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The data come from Samoylov Island in the Lena Delta in Siberia. A measuring station has been located there on a specially erected tower since 2002. Additional measurements, for example of ground temperatures and thaw depths, were carried out in the surrounding area. Initially, the researchers limited their measurements to the summer months, as winter conditions were too harsh and travel too problematic. Moreover, there was no year-round power supply. After the construction of a permanently manned research station in 2013, it was possible to gradually extend the measurement series to the whole year. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, German-Russian cooperation has been frozen, so no one can say for sure whether measurements there will continue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Measured for the first time: Rise in methane emissions in the early summer tundra<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The researchers used data from 2002 to 2019 for their analysis. \u201cWe probably provide the first evidence of an increase in methane emissions from the early summer tundra over the last two decades,\u201d the team writes in Nature Climate Change. \u201cWe can also confirm earlier studies that said the cold season should definitely not be ignored: up to 39% of a year’s emissions take place during this period.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

GFZ researcher Torsten Sachs, corresponding author and one of the principal investigators, explains the background: \u201cWe actually see for the first time from measured data that something is happening in the Arctic in terms of methane emissions and that this is clearly related to the increase in temperature.\u201d He cautions: \u201cHowever, we can only make statements about the summer months of June, July and August, in September it already becomes unclear and for the rest of the year we simply lack sufficient data.\u201d Thus, a shift of emissions within the summer with higher rates in the early summer months is clear, but no reliable statement can be made about whether more greenhouse gas is released over the year as a whole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Importance of vegetation for methane emissions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The researchers explain the shift with the increased growth of mosses and sedges \u2013 the classic tundra vegetation. Growing roots in the soil and biochemical processes lead to increased methane emissions in June and July. The fear that the ground would thaw more deeply is not confirmed by the data analyzed in the current study. On the contrary: \u201cWe did not find a significant increase in ground temperature despite a 0.3 degree rise in air temperature,\u201d says the second principal investigator, Lars Kutzbach of the University of Hamburg. The team suspects that the stronger growth of the plants protects the soil from direct solar radiation. Thus, the vegetation there acts as a kind of temperature buffer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Importance of long data series for reliable statements<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the global methane balance, the permafrost regions of the Arctic play a small role, contributing around three percent to the burden on the atmosphere, with the majority worldwide coming from agriculture. In general, it is difficult to accurately quantify emissions. \u201cIt is all the more important that we arrive at reliable statements through long data series, which we can then compare with the models,\u201d says Kutzbach.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n