Rechargeable lithium air batteries are a next-generation technology: Theoretically they might be much lighter and offer better performance than current lithium ion batteries.
However, currently they run out of steam after only a few charging cycles. Researchers at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) and the Forschungszentrum Jülich have now investigated the processes and discovered a possible culprit: highly reactive singlet oxygen, which is released when the batteries are charged.
A trimming diet is in order: Cell phones still bulge from jacket pockets and laptop computers continue to overstrain shoulder muscles. To blame are primarily the batteries: The ubiquitous lithium ion batteries need heavy electrodes made of transition metal oxides.
Light-weight alternatives are thus sought after. “One of the most promising approaches is the lithium air battery in which the lithium cobalt oxide cathode is replaced by carbon particles,” explains Johannes Wandt, doctoral candidate and member of Prof. Hubert Gasteiger’s team in the Department of Technical Electrochemistry at TUM.
“The theoretical energy density of these new rechargeable batteries is significantly higher than that of traditional lithium ion batteries:” Unfortunately, the technology is not yet ready for everyday use because rechargeable lithium air batteries have only a very short lifetime: After only a few charging cycles the carbon electrode becomes corroded and the electrolytic fluid decomposes. “The problem was that no one knew exactly why,” remarks Wandt.
The mystery of the short battery life
In collaboration with his colleagues, Wandt has now solved the mystery. The Munich scientists, together with experts from the Forschungszentrum Jülich, identified a potential culprit for the decaying electrodes and electrolytic fluid in an experiment: Singlet oxygen, an extremely reactive substance, is created when lithium air batteries are charged. Within fractions of a second it corrodes the surrounding material it comes into contact with.
The suspicion that singlet oxygen damages batteries is not altogether new. But only now have the researchers detected the highly reactive substance. Why it took so long? “Simply put, no one bothered to look for it,” suspects TUM researcher Johannes Wandt. Because of a miscalculation the research community mistakenly assumed that the underlying reaction only occurs at high voltages. A rather complex experimental setup further compounded the situation.
Two years of fiddling
In order to investigate the charging process more precisely, the TUM researchers built a special lithium air battery. The power sinks are thin and arranged in a helix form inside a transparent glass housing. This ensures that microwave radiation and magnetic fields essential for the measurements are not shielded.
“In addition, we added molecules to the electrolytic fluid that capture the short-lived singlet oxygen and bond it as a stable radical,” reports Wandt. “Using a special measuring instrument in Jülich for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, or EPR, we were able to substantiate the formation of singlet oxygen during the charging process.
”The problem has thus been identified – but not averted. Now, the researchers hope to find a mechanism to prevent the formation of singlet oxygen during charging. “Basic research could provide the foundation for the development of novel, long-lasting lithium air batteries,” says Wandt.
The work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the project Materials and components for batteries with high energy density (MEET HiEnd) and the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology under the project EEBatt. The EEBatt project is part of the interdisciplinary research initiative TUM.Energy of the Munich School of Engineering.
- Singlet Oxygen Formation during the Charging Process of an Aprotic Lithium-Oxygen Battery; Johannes Wandt, Peter Jakes, Josef Granwehr, Hubert A. Gasteiger, Rüdiger-A. Eichel; Angewandte Chemie, Intl. Ed., 26.04.2016 – DOI: 10.1002/ange.201602142